The recent proliferation of Anti-war
"Peace marches"suggest to me that a visible message from a minority carries more
weight in the media than does a quiet majority. Somehow, the Anti-war
Protestors cumulative voice is heard by the media and portrayed, it seems in a way
that suggests that the protestors, in fact speak for the nation. Simple mathematics
suggests this to be illogical but public opinion many times is not based on logistics or
even basic math.
I am not a politically involved person. I actually find it objectionable although I
agree that politics is a necessary evil. I have been appalled ever since the September 11
assault on the American people to have the C.E.O. of Canada (our Prime Minister) make an
unjustifiable statement about America having brought the tragedy onto itself and whine
about not being mentioned in President Bushs speech immediately following the
tragedy.
I found it egregious to have Mr. Chretien waffle throughout an extended time period
leading up to the Iraq situation and was shocked to hear his Cabinet members like Liberal
MP Carolyn Parish making comments on the Americans such as "Damn Americans,
I hate those bastards" (and not being fired over it), another calling the
President of the United States a "moron" publicly in the media, Liberal
cabinet minister Herb Dhaliwal saying "U.S. President George Bush has not only let
Americans but the world down by not being a statesman", Liberal MP Janko Peric
saying publicly "Do you think President Bush really cares about Iraqi people? I
dont think so", NDP MP Svend Robinson: "It may very well be that many of
us consider Bush a war criminal" and DP MP Bill Blaikie: "Bush is planning every
minute of his life to kill as many Iraqi children as he can"!
Mr. Chretien, without discussion, consultation or input from Canadians, and in spite of
an Ipso-Reid poll released on March 14th that actually stated that fifty two (52%) percent
of Canadians believed that the United States had made the case for war on Iraq and
that the United Nations should have authorized military action, told the world that
most of the citizens of Canada solidly oppose the war. Obviously, Mr. Chretiens
position is a far cry from what Canadians feel! The question: "What kind of democracy
do we have in Canada" begs to be asked.
Fifty nine (59%) percent of respondents to the Ipso-Reid poll (above) went on and said
war shouldnt proceed without UNs blessing (which we all know never came thanks
to France, Germany, Russia, having veto power at the UN). The significant thing is that
fifty two percent is a very far cry from Jean Chretiens representations that: "Canadians
think war is not justified".
Quite on the contrary, I believe that hundreds of thousands if not millions of
Canadians are seriously troubled by the way Mr. Chretien has cavalierly ignored our
historic allies at a critical point in time. He has also ignored our national concern
about Saddam Hussein and weapons of mass murder. I am seriously concerned that he would,
apparently arbitrarily, represent his own view to the world ahead of the view of the
Canadian people and represent it as the position of the Country to the global community.
The masses of whom I speak may not be marching in the streets, screaming insults and
carrying signs that portray their particular point of view but this substantial portion of
the Canadian population is there, is listening and watching, and hopefully will let their
position be known possibly at elections time. These are very serious times and
mismanagement, disloyalty and now misrepresentation is a poor accounting for conduct
granted to this nations Leader.
It is apparent that drastic steps are in order. Apparently we are ham strung to put a
muzzle on this man. The statements (above) made by prominent officials in our Government
are not acceptable by any standard and any ethical Government would dismiss the
individuals for such grevious unprofessional conduct.
Prior to all of this breaking out, I was appalled to learn of his intent to stay on as
Leader to spite his opponent as if the Leadership job in this country was some kind of
entertainment or amusement for him. What I saw then as a very serious flaw in the
stability of this nations way of life has blown into a very real and potentially
damaging situation.
Just listening to the press (CTV) "am" I note biases in the reporting of
Shamus and Lisa who are beleaguering the issue of reports of the potential hit on Saddam
that may have injured or killed him and the analysis of every "frame of video"
(Shamus) presenting the intellectual (poetic license applies) position that it is the
Administration introducing this speculation as opposed to the Press itself!
I am reassured to see Canadian Alliance Leader Stephen Harper take up the fight on the
Countrys behalf. Ive got to say that he just won my vote! I believe that the
quiet masses mentioned above may prove of a similar persuasion and materially influence
the outcome of the next elections in this Country.
Not only did Mr. Harper chastise Mr. Cretien, he vehemently argued that joining our
allies was in Canadas best interest. "A country that does not honour its own
friends and allies in a dangerous world, but uses and rejects them at will - such a
country will in time endanger its own existence," Harper emphasized. "This
country was forged in large part by war, not because it was easy but because it was
right," he went on to say. "In the great wars of the last century Canada did
not merely stand with the Americans, we more often than not led the way. Saddam and the
perpetrators of 9/11 are the polar opposite of us and our allies" he said, "vowing
to keep up the fight" for these higher values which "shaped our past, and
which we will need in an uncertain future".
It is a defining point in history for us all, individually and as a nation. The issues
found herein demand the attention of every citizen of this country, or we might as well
post a sign at the boarder reading: "the last one to leave - shut off the
lights"! This is not the first time that I have been forced to comment on Mr.
Chretien "not speaking for me".
I am not convinced that I gain honest or credible information from the conventional
media. Specifically with the Canadian media I am convinced that a bias toward America is
present in the substantial majority of its "content". This is clearly reflecting
in a recent CBC (The Government Broadcaster) advertising approach to promoting a
show within its programming around the Iraq situation.